Michael Sporn Animation – Splog

I Say, I Say . . . Son! This is the title of a book by Robert McKimson Jr. Any ideas what it might be about?

Sound anything like Foghorn Leghorn?

Yes, it’s a tribute to Bob McKimson with a big nod to Chuck and Tom McKimson, as well. This, to me, is something of a feat in its own right. The book is a workhorse of a picture book with lots of valuable images that you haven’t seen before. It’s not like the big glamour picture books that come out of Disney or Dreamworks. The Art of Whatever. It’s not one of those heavyweight oversized books that cause coffee table legs to bowl outward under their weight. No, this is a go to book on good paper; it’s solid. There are lots of drawings and photographs, frame grabs, newspaper clippings, and posters. Just looking at the pictures will give you a pretty good idea of the story the book is telling.

And it’s a valuable story – the part of the jigsaw puzzle that’s been left missing.

There have been about a half dozen books by and about Chuck Jones, one enormously expensive tome on Friz Freleng with lots of key references to him in most animation histories. Bob Clampett did a lot to promote himself; he gave us films and videos, not books. There are at least three Tex Avery books. This is the first on Robert McKimson – the other Warner’s director. And it was written by his son.

McKimson was loved by Leon Schlesinger who tried to make him a director early on. Yet, Bob didn’t feel that he was ready. He became the head of all animators in the studio, responsible for solidifying the style of all the different variations of the characters. He helped tie Jones’ Bugs Bunny to Freleng’s or Clampett’s Porky Pig to Tashlin’s. When Schlesinger sold the studio in 1944 and Eddie Selzer took charge, McKimson pushed himself into the directorial position, and he gave us meat and potatoes films with characters that were all his: Foghorn Leghorn, the Tasmanian Devil, Sylvester Jr., and some of the Speedy Gonzales work.

Before reading this book I was certainly well aware of Bob McKimson‘s work, and I was not quite as familiar with the other McKimson brothers. I’m not sure much has changed about that. As an animator Bob McKimson was brilliant, but as a director I never quite saw the lyricism that we saw in some of his best animation. McKimson was the Milt Kahl of the WB studios. He could draw like dynamite and knew every trick in the service of giving the tightest, sharpest animation possible. When you look at his scenes you’ll see beautifully drawn animation with solid timing and a muscular approach. Go to an extreme and take the pose as far as you can, and then go farther still, and then go even farther still. Bob not only did that, but his brilliant draftsmanship held the characters together in those unrelenting poses. It was near miraculous how _____2 of many Bugs model sheets drawn by Bob McKimson
he pulled that off. Animators
like Rod Scribner or Jim Tyer would go as far as he did, but their drawings blew up into funny. Bob’s artwork just got more solid. Bobe Cannon was probably the only other person at WB that could match him for drawing ability. Even still Cannon would purposefully distort his drawings more than McKimson would. Bobe was interested in the 20th Century Art, Bob was interested in the artistry.

As may be obvious, I’m not the greatest enthusiast when it comes to Bob’s direction. It all shows so little panache that I must say I’ve easily dismissed it. The work is just that, a solid bit of work. The backgrounds are cartoon realistic. No flair the way you’d find in Maurice Noble‘s art, no personality as in Paul Julian‘s paintings. Dick Thomas, Cornett Wood and Robert Gribbroek did most of the design and background painting. All of the effort was put into the animation and little concentration seemed to focus on the design of the films. I can remember Mike Barrier talking about McKimson’s work. His layouts and the stacks of animation drawings that came from his cartoons far outweighed the piles of art from work by the other directors. Jones’ impeccable poses, Freleng’s exquisite timing. McKimson worked the funny into his cartoons and he got the same from his animators. He used drawings and more drawings. The style came from good, hard solid work, not timing or poetry.

There are all those stories about Rod Scribner and his wildly artistic period under Clampett. He was a different guy under McKimson. It’s hard to see the same animator in the two different phases. There’s pure delight in the animation under Clampett and solid workmanlike craft under McKimson. No doubt this was also because Clampett probably was off leaving Scribner on his own to do what he wanted. McKimson kept Scribner under his thumb and, in my opinion, didn’t get that great and wild personality that had been available. As a matter of fact, I suspect this was true of all the artists McKimson controlled. It probably worked well with the two brothers, Chuck working under Bob’s direction, but I’m not convinced it was the best way for most artists to work.

A Bob McKimson Layout for “daffy Duck Hunt” (1949)

For this book, there can be no doubt that a major source of information had to have been Mike Barrier‘s excellent interview with McKimson. (Go here if you want to read that – and you should have already read it.***) I’m afraid there is no interview with Tom or Chuck McKimson readily available. I would have liked to see more of them in this book. Toward the end of the book, we see roughs and stills from the illustration work the two have done for comics and coloring books. Robert McKimson certainly dominates the bulk of this volume.

It is the visual materials available here that shows the real value of the book and makes it important to own. For anyone who recognizes the importance of WB cartoons and wants the whole picture recognized this is the reason for this book. The artwork. There are some beautiful early drawings printed, especially, the pages of clean-roughs done by Bob that were animated by Tom. Excellent poses once again from Bob with no sign of Chuck’s drawing. Again, it’s only toward the end, when we get into the comic books and other print material, that we see some of Chuck and Tom’s artwork. These are definitely not up to that of Bob’s drawing, but if the focus is to be on all three, we need to see all three on display.

I appreciated the photos throughout as well as a reprint of the few articles about any and all of the brothers. Perhaps more of an analsis from the author about the variance from one artist to another. Despite their being brothers, they do have very different talents and we can see, despite the limited amount of art from Tom & Chuck, that Bob was the obviously the strongest draftsman of the three, but there for the lack of drawings goes this book.

Regardless, I’m glad to have what I do have. The excellent WB art of Bob McKimson and the familiar comic book covers of Tom. Both broght back memories of differing kinds. Chuck, he was the animator, he worked within his brother’s unit at WB, and there isn’t much sign of his drawing. But the films are there, and we can enjoy those films and the talent that went onto their making. I wonder if ever there were a conversation or a statement by Bob about his brothers’ work. Perhaps someday, that curtain will be opened a bit more. Until then, I’m grateful for this book.

*** Actually if you want to go the heart of animation history just go through Mike Barrier‘s archives and interviews, and you’ll have a good solid base. Take a tour of MichaelBarrier.com. Spend a lot of time there.} Perhaps someday we’ll get Mike Barrier’s article about the three brothers. Maybe a review of this book will bring him out on the subject.

Bugs Bunny and the Tortoise
Some roughs for a 1948 book by Bob McKimson.

Top – Layout for “Hippity Hopper” (1949) Bob McKimson
Bot – Layout for “Lighthouse Mouse” (1955) Bob McKimson

Some beautiful roughs for Layouts by Bob McKimson
for “Of Rice and Hen” (1953) directed by him.

A model sheet by Tom McKimson. One of a few in the book.

A comic book page by Tom McKimson
A very different model than Bob would have drawn.

A setup from “Calvin and the Colonel” directed by Chuck McKimson (1962)

- Yes, today is Walt Disney‘s birthday anniversary. He would have been 111 years old. It’s also the anniversary of this Splog. It’s seven years old today; my 2,552nd post. They’ve gotten a lot longer than the initial posts. They’ve also gotten more verbal rather than visual, though my attempt is always to keep it visual. I like putting up pictures, especially if the pictures are ones you see so infrequently.

Yesterday, was a first. I had prepared a review of the new McKimson book, I Say, I Say . . . Son!; I’d spent a hell of a lot of time putting it together. And I was supposed to post it yesterday morning. But I forgot. I never put it up. It’ll be posted tomorrow, but I can’t get over the fact that I’d forgotten to send it out there. Mark Mayerson caught it. This was the first time that I did that, and he checked in to make sure I was OK. Maybe I am, maybe not. Could be Alzheimer’s, could be I just forgot it. I have had some time with that review, and a lot of stuff has gotten in the way with it. I’ll be curious to hear any of your comments on it.

Over those past seven years, there are some posts that I’ve been particularly proud of having run and others that were just filler. It’s interesting how I get pleasure from some posts that you might not expect.

I certainly like posting things that one rarely sees on the internet and enjoy putting out material that every animator should own.

For example, I like putting up storyboard images such as these from Pinocchio: this was composed of photos from animation pencil tests from Pinocchio. Bill Peckmann and John Canemaker contributed.

Some of the actual board was here. The coachman’s ride.

I also enjoyed posting the board from Mr. Toad’s Ride, excerpted from The Wind in the Willows.

Or there was Dumbo takes a bath here.

There was also all the material from The Sword in the Stone as I posted not only the board from mad Madame Mim’s section of that feature, but I included some great artwork by Bill Peet from that film.

I also liked the walk cycles from 101 Dalmatians, here.

I’ve written often enough about his work for you to know that I’m quite a fan of Yurij Norshtein.
There were the chapters from that wonderful little book about Yurij Norshtein:

Norshtein Comics – 1
Norshtein Comics – 2
Norshtein Comics – 3
Norshtein Comics – 4
Norshtein Comics – 5
Norshtein Comics – 6

As a matter of fact, there were a whole string of posts I did about Norshtein when I was reading Claire Kitson‘s brilliant book Yurij Norstein and Tale of Tales: An Animator’s Journey.
for example there was this post on Norshtein’s Battle of Kerzhenets.

Or there was this post about a breakfast I had arranged in my studio for Norshtein and Feodor Khitruk. It was a wonderful morning for me, and I enjoyed sharing it on my blog. (It was sad to note that Feodor Khitruk died this week, December 3rd. I’ll try to put together a proper post to note his life’s work.)

I have been enormously influenced by Norshein, the Hubleys and other animators, such as Tissa David or Jiri Trnka or Bill Tytla. It gives me pleasure to talk about such influences. You can just go to the blue names to the right of the blog to click on those names that are well represented.

Some of these stories really stand out for me. For example, there was this story about Finian’s Rainbow, a Print Magazine article by John Canemaker. I can’t tell you haw many times I’ve gone back there, myself, to look at the material again.

I also enjoy continuing a dialogue I see on the internet. If it gives me a chance to expound on animation, film or acting it often brings me pleasure. There was this post and others about it, thanks to a series by Mark Mayerson, that gave me time to think aloud on this blog.

I have a strong love of design in animation, and I can’t help but call attention to it. George Cannata is a brilliant artist and deserves all the attention he can get. See here and here.

Or John McGrew here and here.

Or T. Hee was brilliant. See here or here.

I also have a wealth of artwork and plenty of information on Rowland B. Wilson. Start here or here or here.

You know, there’s just a lot of material here.

I haven’t even gotten into the wealth of material on loan from Bill Peckmann with his stunning collection of illustration and comic art. It’s just magnificent, and I am so proud to be able to post whatever he sends me whether it’s Rowland Wilson or Harvey Kurtzman, Gahan WIlson or Dick Moores. There’s just a bounty of artwork, and it all demands viewing. What a treasure is there. What a pleasure to post it.

All I can say is that I intend to keep it up. There’s so much more to post, so much more to enjoy,

- Back in the days when animation books were a rarity and actual lessons in books were few and far between, there were Heath Books and equipment. This was a company, if I can remember correctly, which was situated in Florida. They had several books for sale, the most well known was “Animation In Twelve Hard Lessons”. It was spiral bound book and over-sized like the Preston Blair book, it contained detailed instruction on the mechanics of animation.

Bob Heath, I believe, was a former cameraman in animation, and his partner in writing was Tony Creazzo, a former Assistant Animator. If I remember correctly, he was closely aligned with Vinnie Bell in New York. The two were always connected; if you wanted Vinnie to animate, you also hired Tony to assist.

Well, not only did Bob Heath sell How-to books on animation, but he also sold equipment. Paper, pencils, hole punches, even an Oxberry Jr. camera stand could be bought from the company. They had an original design of a light box for sale. Lots of things that could help you set up in the animation business if you had no idea who “Cartoon Colour” was.

I’ve decidded to post this relic of a book, Here in the first chapter is Bob Heath’s “How to Animate in 12 Hard Lessons.”

Front Cover

1
Chapter Index

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

Back Cover

- Way back when, I did a couple of photo posts where I snapped some pictures of things that floated around me in my studio. Things I loved because they were around me, or maybe things that were around me because I loved them. I’m not sure which was which – the chicken or the egg. (See here and here.)

Well, as I once wrote, I’m currently working out of my home for the moment with my studio space in storage. Now, I’ve got a whole bunch of different things around me. These aren’t so obviously animation inclined, but I still love them. So let me give a show-and-tell around this room in the apartment.

1
This is an etching that Heidi bought me for a birthday or some
other gift-giving-event. It’s a tiny picture of a bull which is
framed and positioned over Heidi’s computer in the living room.

I like this little guy.

2
Heidi found this framed and dusty collection of buttons framed and
sitting inside the window of some garment-district store. I guess the
idea was supposed to be the display of the plastic buttons. It sits
hidden in the corner of the living room. I like it a l lot.

When we mixed our three cats together, Robbie, Alexander and Lola, it was
inevitable that they, all three, wouldn’t get along together. Robbie and Alex
are fighting friends (boys); Alex and Lola get along (boy and girl) ; but all 3
together don’t make it. Lola’s claimed the bedroom for herself, and if Robbie
even tries, horrendous cat cawls emerge from the bedroom. Of course, all
Robbie wants to do is get into that bedroom and start the wail we hear.

So a rope ties the bedroom door to a hall closet keeping the entrance impossible
for Robbie. The rope started out as a bathrobe belt, got some silk ribbons added
when that broke; and finally some twine extended it to the second door.
Whatever, it works.

4
Ah, for the good old days of baby Claudie. I loved that guy.
He died in my arms on a final visit to the vet. He knew how
to do things, that boy. I loved him for 20 years.
His picture is over the piano in the living room.

5
I’m sure you’ll remember that I’m a puppet guy.
This Indonesian rod puppet sits atop the no-longer-in-use
record changer. Both like to gather dust, and Heidi attacks
the dust weekly week or there abouts depending on the weather.

6
This trick bank is no doubt an iron reproduction, but
it’s still great just as it is. Put 5 cents in the dog’s
mouth, and he jumps through the clown’s hoop to
deposit the nickel into the barrel.

7
This replacement board came from the Winter Garden Theater.
When an actor doesn’t make it for a show, the board announces
the names of any replacements that’ll be going on. Heidi’s name
appeared here many times as she sat out the end of Cats.
When Cats closed and Mama Mia opened they got new boards backstage.

Lots of junk – such as 3D glasses – have replaced the sliding names
(which Heidi also has in the back. They don’t make the item any more
exciting.)

8
Pinocchio is something of an antique. The puppet sold in 1939
when the Disney film was released. It’s made of a wooden mulch.
Sort of a mix of sawdust combined with glue; he looks just like
the real thing. Behind Pinocchio is a picture drawn by a childhood
friend of Heidi’s.

9
Finally there’s the metal kitchen cabinets. Magnets hold a lot of
pictures in place. God help us if there’s to be an East Coast
earthquake. Lots of magnets mixed with images would wind up
in the sink.

– Back in 1984 when I was nominated for the Academy Award, I learned of the nomination the night before the full list of three nominees was announced. Prior to that I had no clue I was even being considered. As a matter of fact, after submitting the film, Doctor DeSoto, I had virtually forgotten that I had entered it. I’d considered it such a ridiculous long shot that I knew there was no chance of it happening.

Then I happened to run into Jerry Beck in an elevator on the day before the nominations were announced. He congratulated me on having been nominated. The blood dropped from my head, and it wasn’t the speed of the elevator. The next day, 6am – New York time, I phoned LA to find that it was true. I can remember the Academy operator reading the list of nominees to me. When she said my name, I said, “That’s me.” I made that operator’s day, she was so happy. Things were different back then. I was in a state of shock – happyShock.

That was the first year that the Academy had created the “Nominee Luncheon.” Those that were nominated were invited to a luncheon in Los Angeles. Things were pretty tight back then – financially – and I saw little possibility of my being able to afford the trip. However, just when I was deciding to say no, I’d received a call from American Airlines saying that a special deal was created between the Oscars and American to charge half rate for nominees going to LA. One just had to agree to fly West for the luncheon AND the Oscars. Since I’d already budgeted to fly to LA for the ceremony, now I could fly West twice for the same amount. I went to the luncheon and had a grand time.

I was seated at a round table at the Beverly Hills Hotel suite. I was the only animator at the table. Pat Sito was my “date” for the evemt, and I couldn’t have had a better one. Pat’s always been such a fun person, yet so smart. It was perfect. To my left was Bill Scott. He said he’d asked to be at my table. He’d seen a short I did about the library for kids’ use. Nobody knew that film, yet I thought it was a sweeet piece I’d done. I couldn’t believe it. Mr. Scott will alwayhs be beloved by me. No matter that I loved him for being the voicer of Bullwinkle J. Moose. Forget that he wrote all those great UPA films I loved. It’s just that he was the guy. I won the Oscar at that first nominees’ luncheon, and I’ll never forget it

- Beginning Dec 12th, The Film Forum will feature a two week run of the original home-grown animated feature, Consuming Spirits, Chris Sullivan’s original and complex work of art. The multi-media animated film comes at us with an original story which is set in motion when a nun is killed in a car accident.

Priscilla Frank of the Huffingtonn Post wrote: “The animation took 15 years of work… (and) seamlessly combines cutout animation,
pencil drawing, collage, and stop-motion animation to create the haunting atmosphere of a self-contained world…ugly characters (who) make up the most beautiful spectacle you’ve ever seen.”

CONSUMING SPIRITS (2012) was produced, written, & directed by Chris Sullivan with editing, and sound also by Sullivan. It’s a film to be seen. Give yourself a Christmas resent; take a chance on it.

Hopefully, I’ll see it in full this week and can write about it next Saturday.________________________________________________Chris Sullivan

- There are some other animated features well under-way in New York. I’ve seen two in-progress films and I am really excited about what’s going on.

In the past week I saw a half-hour of Elliot Cowan‘s fine film, the Boxhead and Roundhead feature. This is the feature length version of the short films he’s been doing for years. Graphically, those black and white shorts were brimming with exciting animation in vibrant black and white. The feature, of course, expands on what was done in the shorts and is graphically one of the most exciting animated films I’ve seen in ages. Elliot has about a hlaf hour done, and the film is well on its way. I can only speak high of it, but I’m reluctant to say much of anything for fear of giving away something I don’t have the right to say. If you’ve heard any chat about this movie, it’s true. This film is as good as anything I’ve recently seen. And I’ve seen it all – big budget and no budget.

Then, last night I saw a rough cut of the brilliant film Signe Baumane has been making. Rocks In My Pockets. Wow.

What else can I say. The animation is done, and about half of the film is in color, but all of it is top rate. Art is what it is. I love the 3D backgrounds and also wish Sine made more of them, but it’s telling that she has a brilliant element in her film, and she’s not exploiting it for all she could. This film is original in the way any work of art would be. I can’t wait to see more, and I’ll do anything she needs to help out.

After reading her blog for the past year or two, I’ve been a dedicated follower. Her writing is just first rate. When you put it together with the work on this film, you realize just how great a storyteller she is.

Signe is putting together the final color of the film, and has connected with a composer who will write the score for her. As expected, she’ll need money to complete the film, and naturally she’ll want to put together a Kickstarter campaign. Once she gets into that mode, the film will be well on its way to completion. Of course, I’ll be there – as will this Splog to tell you about it – giving any help Signe can use from me. I’m hot to see this movie completed. It’s good. In the meantime, read her blog, Rocks in My Pockets.

- Then this week there were some events with stars built in.

On Tuesday, there was a luncheon. Marion Cotillard and Matthias Schoenaerts were going to be there representing their Belgian film, Rust and Bone. She played a double amputee, and he played a hard-beaten fist-boxer who were attracted to each other. There were other complications like a child for the guy and his sister who was taking care of the pre-teen. The film was raw and honest and had two great performances at its center. She was, if anything, better than him, and that’s saying a lot. She was just great and deserves a nomination.

At the luncheon (chicken over some sprinkled lettuce type things) I was seated with a number of PR members. They were totally entertaining, and it was a good lunch. James Toback also sat nearby. He’s a wild kind-of producer/director whose last great film was the 2008 documentary, Tyson (that was the title of the biography of Mike Tyson.) Before long Matthias Schoenaerts was sitting between me and James Toback. Toback talked about how Tyson probably would have loved his boxing in the film. I think he would have, too. We had a great conversation that must have lasted about 40 miutes. Meanwhile, Marion Cotillard came by and introduced herself to me. Boy is she beautiful. She was sharp, too, and kept a nice conversation going. The luncheon was fun.

That night Heidi and I went to see Lincoln. I’d seen it, she hadn’t, and there was an opening. No one can beat Daniel Day Lewis this year. The film is fabulous, but it needs an ending. Spielberg didn’t get that and left the film hanging. It reminds me of Elvis Presley’s first film. He get killed at the end of the film. They couldn’t leve him dead and brought him back as a double exposure in the sky singing his song, “Love Me Tender.” Lincoln brings back D.D.Lewis as the President double exposed in the sky reciting some speech as honest Abe. There were so many more creative things they could have done. No honest ending. Sall Fields does a good job, too. Though every once in a while she shows up as Sally Field.

On Wednesday, there was a luncheon for Michael Caine and Chris Nolan of the Dark Night. Somehow I was sitting next to Michael Uslan who owns the rights to Batman ____________Michael Caine and Michael Uslan
and made a fortune off the
past half dozen films he licensed. We talked a while about the animated films done by Bruce Timm et al. I love them almost as much as he does. It didn’t take long before Michael Caine was sitting next to me, actually, between me and Mr. Uslan. (When sitting down Mr. Caine leaned on my shoulder to get into the seat at the table for dessert. I may never wash that shoulder again.) Mr. Caine is a great storyteller, and it was my treat to be sitting there.

That evening I went to see Brad Pitt in Killing Me Softly. This film was something of a low-rent mob treat. Lots of killing and poor type mobsters. I was caught up in the film.

Yeah, this was a good week. Up coming this week will be a dinner with Jessica Chastain and Katherine Bigelow seeing her film, Zero Dark Thirty. Maybe i’ll get to sit next to Ms. Chastain, who has Monday off from her play, The Heiress.

This Oscar season business has turned out to be a real treat for me.

- This week also saw a theatrical debut in the family. My sweetheart, Heidi Stallings, got a job not too long ago, working for the Upper West Side YMCA. There they produce plays for kids, junior versions of some of Broadway’s greats. Heidi has, in the past, directed quite a few of these shows in many of the outer boroughs. Last year she did The Music Man, previously she’d done Into the Woods, Beauty and the Beast, and Annie. Currently, she’s also doing Fiddler on the Roof in Maspeth, Queens. They’ve all been fun, and I get to see these shortened versions of the shows. Essentially, the heart of these shows is there as done by youngsters – kids from 10-15. These have all been fun.

This past Wednesday her version of The Music Man opened with a live band under the direction of John Prestianni with choreography by Alana Marie Urda. Bonnie Hilton has been the show’s stage manager. Kara Branch did costumes, and Sara Schetterdid the stage design/sets.

The show is directed by Heidi Stallings. It’ll play though Sunday’s matinee.

Steven Macntosh is the Managing and Artistic Director of the Kids Company. It’s quite a troupe, and they put on very sophisticated shows in only a short couple of months with a large cast of kids. It’s pretty wonderful, if you ask me, and I couldn’t be prouder of Heidi if she were directing anything other.

Fritz Baumgarten has done Chrismas as well as any other illustrator out there. For the next four Fridays, beginning with today’s post, Bill Peckmann and I are presenting Christmas stories through the eyes of Mr. Baumgarten and other such great illustrators.

We start with this book, Weihmachtsfest in Wichtelland. And here to introduce this book is Mr. Peckmann:

As a kid many years ago, if you had a favorite cartoonist, the only thing better than that was when that cartoonist did a Christmas book or story for the Holiday Season. Here is a charming Christmas confection by Fritz Baumgarten and a delicious delight it is, both the single color pages and the full color ones. Enjoy.

The book’s cover

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

.

The End

- There’s no way to know who animated this walk cycle. Perhaps it’s a commercial by Lu Guarnier. Vince Cafarelli was Lu’s assistant; so if I had to guess, I’d say that Lu animated it and Vince did the cleanup.

For the QT movie of it, I moved the character into place so that we could run it on a cycle.

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

____________________

The following QT movie was made reworking the positioning
of the character on the pages. This enables us to see a repeated
cycle without Magoo bouncing back to the starting position.

It’s certainly a fast walk.
You figure a natural walk is 12 frames per foot hit / 24 frames for both.
This cycle takes just 18 frames. Presumably it’s part of the overall timing.

- Last Wednesday, I posted a number of models and LOs from this small commercial studio, the Robert Lawrence Studio. The art is quite extraordinary and, in my opinion, is stronger than the work I’d seen from UPA-NY. i’ve been told that George Cannata was the principal designer/layout artist for the studio. Hence, I believe that many of these, certainly the more daring, are his work.

Bill Peckmann told a story of having him as an instructor. One week he took them on a class trip to the Robert Lawrence Studio. This was the first time Bill said he was able to see the inside of an animation studio a life-changing event for a number of them. Wane Becker also talked of this trip. Bill said that George was on a trip to be an artist, and he worked in animation to make a living. Animation profited – commercial animation. It seemed the entire family were artists George Cannata Sr. & Jr. as well as Dolores Cannata.

I’m just going to pick up where I left off last time with more models and pre-production sketches for many commercial spots.

1
Jell-o is served, Madame.

2

3

4

5

6

7

8
This is my favorite of all the pieces collected here.

9
Another variation of these guys first seen in part 1 of this post.

10

11
Same interviewer, different interviewee.

12

13

14

15

16

17

18
Here are three models for this Mars Bar spot.

19
And here are a couple of layouts.

20

21

22
Obviously another child.

23
Two layouts for a character that could only
have escaped from the 60s.

24
Zagreb grew out of UPA.
Styles grew out of Zagreb in the 60s.

25
A left over clown.

26
Three mothers with a lot of style.

27
Here are another group of interesting layouts with style to spare.

28

29

30

31

32

- A week or so back, Bill Peckmann treated us to an issue of the NYDaily News‘ television guide from a typical Sunday issue. Here, Bill completes the issue with some images of Entertainment figures of interest to most older Boomers out there. If only Romney had won, this is the world we’d have seen more of. I still find it interesting that the magazine pictures are in color though color TV hadn’t been introduced as yet. From the “A little memorabilia never hurt anyone” department:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7
Bob & Ray lookng a bit like Abbot & Costello

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

23

24

25

26

27

- The Gerald McBoing Boing Show, in the 1950′s had a number of animated pieces on poets, painters and other artists. Of these the most famous film is probably The Invisible Moustache or Raoul Dufy. Another interesting film is one on the Post-Impressionist artist, Henri Rousseau.