Commentary 19 Dec 2009 09:29 am
Panic Attack
– I haven’t given a lot of attention to the animated epic now playing at the Film Forum in NY. A Town Called Panic is an oddity that I can’t quite figure out.
When I was 12 I’d bought my first movie camera – a regular 8mm camera (pre super-8mm days) with paralax viewfinder (meaning you could properly frame animation) that was able to shoot single frame images (so you could shoot animation.) I bagan filming my first drawn films – that usually lasted about 10 or 20 seconds apiece.
The challenge was that the roll of film was 100 ft long (3 minutes) and you had to do something with the rest of the roll of film before you could send it away to get it developed (via the local pharmacy.) So I filmed some pics of my siblings playing and quickly got bored with that number.
That’s when I started filming the massive collection of cowboys and indians that I owned. I’d set up the charge of the light brigade and animate it. I recreate the battles in a John Wayne (meaning John Ford) film I’d watched in animation. Hundreds of cowboys and Indians crashing into each other while galloping over my bedroom linoleum and recreated scenery.
I ultimately shot about a half hour of this stuff trying to fill up the rolls of film that incorporated the paper-drawn animation I was so desperate to see.
So now comes a movie out of France, “A Town Called Panic,” and I’m not sure what to make of it. From the YouTube trailer and short film called cake of these pieces, I’m hardly sold on it. It seems like little more than what I did when I was 12 with a snappy, loud, screaming voice track added on to it.
But then comes recvommendations by people I know (like Elliot Cowna and Mike Rauch) who’ve seen it as well as extremely positive newspaper reviews (NYTimes “Mr. Aubier and Mr. Patar are up to much more than pop-culture parody, though they do their share of that.” NYDaily News – 4 stars “. . . best saved for those who like to find surprises under their tree.”)
I guess my difficulty is that I don’t really think of it as animation – of course it is, just not very sophisticated animation. The telling is in the sound track, and I’m a bit tired of that type film. South Park did it and still does it best, while at the same time surprising you with infrequent bits of superb animation. With A Town Called Panic, I have no expectations of superb animation, but when A.O.Scott uses words like “lyricism” and “Michel Gondry” it has to pique my interest.
I know I’ll eventually see it, and should take all the positive comments as a reason to recommend others see it, but it’s still hard for me to get up the energy. The difficulty is that there’s only a limited window of time to see it. I have to get off my rocker.
The Film Forum is showing it
through Tuesday, December 29 with showtimes at: 1, 2:40, 4:15, 6, 8, and 10.
- Last night I went to a screening of AVATAR. This film promises a lot that I dislike in movies: 3D, science fantasy (full of weird names like Na’vi and Pandora etc.), fantastic “Art”, and MoCap, just to name a few. For me, it all blends together in one big word that I have trouble getting past – “FAKE”.
Surprise, surprise. I loved the movie. It’s borderline pretentious in some places but the rest! Not only was I pulled in by the 3D (despite my watering eyes through the last half of the film), but I had a hard time taking off my glasses. The story was absorbing enough that it was hard to feel the 2 hr. 40 min. running time. The acting was watchable (though a number of lines really popped out as laughable).
The big thing about it was the imagined world, that just seemed real. You get totally absorbed into Cameron’s animation that you buy it wholly. While watching it, a fleeting thought kept passing the front of my brain. This is what we’re going to get in the future. This is what movies will be like in another 3 or 4 years. Not real and not animated. Some kind of bastard child that will be poorly handled by most filmmakers, but will come alive in the hands of a James Cameron. It’s terrifyingly sad in some ways because I think we’re already there.
(Johnny Knoxville is already promising “AVATAR-like effects” with his 3rd installment of “Jackass” !)
Scott Tobias, in his review at the Onion’s AV Club, wrote a prophetic line: “As the film’s technical marvels grow commonplace, it will look like a clunky old theme-park attraction, a Captain EO for our time.”
Maybe that’s why I champion The Fantastic Mr. Fox – because it’s such a hand-made picture. Lovingly finger-touched heart winning animation. It’s the antithesis of Avatar and will probably remain more evergreen. Bite the bullet and see both of them – in a theater.