Action Analysis &Animation &Animation Artifacts 09 Apr 2013 07:23 am

Johnny Gent’s Spellbinder – recap

Johnny (Gentilella) Gent had the hardest time on the Letterman series done for the original Electric Company. He could never get the characters and kept trying to add 3D form to the 2D characters that John Hubley had created.

It was my first job, and I was in awe of every animator that walked through ________A very early John Hubley model of Spellbinder.
the door. We had 2½ months to do
all the artwork on the 20 spots that were 2½ mins each. A total of 50 mins in 10 weeks. (That’s about right these days for a 30 second spot!)

I did all the assisting, inking and inbetweening and had to do it quickly. (I estimated about 18 secs. per drawing. The game I played with myself to keep up was to keep one eye on the drawing and another on the clock.)

As I said, it was my first animation job. What did I know! I had to take Johnny’s drawings and reshape them into Hubley’s characters, and I had to do it in ink. No pencil tests. Just do it. Whatever came out, was the final artwork (and I use that word loosely.) I felt, even while I was doing it, that I was killing Johnny’s work, so it went as it did.

Here’s a cycle of Johnny Gent’s Spellbinder rowing a boat.

1
(If you click on any drawing it’ll show you the full animation page.

3

4

5

7


Johnny Gent’s Spellbinder rows a boat
on two’s per drawing indicated
Click left side of the black bar to play.
Right side to watch single frame.

Six months later, I was on a lay-off from the Hubley Studio in need of a job. At NY Institute of Technology, a school in Long Island, they were starting work on a feature animated film that the school’s dean, Alexander Schure, was financing. He had decided to create the world’s largest computer animation department, and they were just barely starting to get a reputation for the incredible people they were employing (Ed Catmull, Alvy Ray Smith and other pioneers among them), but first they were going to do this hand-drawn feature.

TubbyCUOut of the blue, I got a call from Johnny Gentilella. He was now the head of animation at Tubby the Tuba and was offering me a job as an Asst. Animator. NYIT was my alma mater, so I was curious to see what the place now looked like. Assistant was a promotion with a pay raise. I took the job right quick.

The staff included about ten people in those early days, and we worked in what seemed like a log cabin. I was given a seat directly across from the front door and handed a scene of Tubby the Tuba to clean-up and inbetween. I did it. Then another, then another, then another.

A few weeks later, at lunchtime, Johnny and I were alone in the space eating our sandwiches. I took the opportunity of apologizing to him for what I did at Hubley’s studio. I was taking Johnny’s sculpted drawings and flattening them. To make up time I skipped a step by not working in pencil. I’d clean up with a Sharpie on heavy paper. In the process flattening and taking all of the life out of the drawing. I apologized to John for what I felt was destroig his work. I was also only days into my first job and didn’t really know what I was doing. But I did it anyway.

He said that he hadn’t even noticed. Because of the schedule and the budget on the Letterman series, he knew I was doing what was best for the work. There was nothing I needed to apologize for. He appreciated how I felt but told me not to worry about it.

At the same time, I pointed out that I had just done a scene of Tubby the Tuba giving a speech at a lectern. It was identical, drawing for drawing, of a scene Johnny had done at Hubley’s. There it was Spellbinder, here it was Tubby. How and why did John do that?

He explained that on films like Letterman they were done so fast that there was no time for Pencil Tests. Animators couldn’t do as they did in the old days, animate a scene then see a PT of the scene and correct it if it needed the work. They had to knock out the scenes. If anything went wrong it was the animator’s fault and he’d be out of a job and a future contact for further work. So animators did what they knew would work. Better to be stale and save face, keeping your job, than to be daring and without a job.

Letterman2The following Saturday, I told Tissa David this story. She was giving me lessons in animation and inbetweening on Saturday mornings at her apartment. I let Tissa know about Johnny’s cheating to make it work. Tissa’s response – “How lucky Johnny is! I wish I had such luck!” She said she was unlucky to have a memory that couldn’t remember how to do such a scene and to catalogue the work, math and all, in her memory. Obviously John could do that. Tissa, instead, had to approach every scene as wholly new. She had to ____________________Tissa’s Letterman”
animate from scratch whereas John could
pull the scene from his memory.

I got Tissa’s point.

.

.
Note: the drawing of Tubby, above, was done by the
animator, Ed DeMattia, many months later in the production.

4 Responses to “Johnny Gent’s Spellbinder – recap”

  1. on 09 Apr 2013 at 9:29 am 1.Richard O'Connor said …

    The Hubley production makes an interesting contrast in light of the recent Raggedy Ann post(s).

  2. on 09 Apr 2013 at 1:18 pm 2.anik said …

    This is a very inspiring story, shows such a passion for animation, respect for the artwork and the desire to do the best despite extreme constraints that now is rare to find. I found some of the Letterman spots on youtube – they have a lot of charm and creativity.

  3. on 10 Apr 2013 at 12:16 am 3.John said …

    Shamus Culhane mentioned in his autobiography that Seymour Knietel would pull out stock walks and actions as a head animator at Fleischers in order to speed up production. As head of Famous Studios while Gent was there in the 1940s and 50s, Gent’s having the ability to file away similar actions and call them up when needed was no doubt appreciated by the boss, even if overuse of the device helped make for continuing series cartoons by the 1950s where it was hard to remember one from another due in part to the repeated actions.

  4. on 10 Apr 2013 at 5:52 am 4.Michael said …

    Johnny Gent was one of NY’s best animators. His style was clean, his performance was always consistent. He was a dependable animator and deserved the respect he had all his life in the City. I completely understood his need of a backup crutch to protect himself. Animation was a dirty business in the 70s , and animators would have to fight to hold onto their jobs. It was those very bosses, Kneitel and Terry and their offspring – Culhane, Zander and other commercial house operators – that made free-lance animation in NY a precarious occupation.
    One assistant animator was layed off by Jack Zander. Zander saw it as a temporary layoff; the employee saw it as being out of work for 9 weeks before accepting a 2-week job elsewhere. Zander phoned that assistant to tell him he was a “traitor” and would never work for Zander again. The assistant told me that story 17 years after the fact and still hadn’t worked for Zander since.
    Even competition among the ranks worked against you. I knew two assistant animators who hated each other. One had gone out on strike during the Terry u-nion strike in the 40s; the other got his start in animation by replacing that striking man. Terry won, in the end, with the striking staff his permanent people.
    Worried about animating Tubby at a lectern? That’s the small stuff.

Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply

eXTReMe Tracker
click for free hit counter

hit counter